Empty subjects
All finite clauses (IP-MAT
, IP-SUB
) are required to have a subject, and this is what drives the policy for including empty subjects. Infinitival clauses (IP-INF
) are not required to have a subject.
All empty subjects appear as early as possible in the clause.
There are four types of empty subject:
\*con\*
: subject elision under conjunction\*pro\*
: referential null subject\*arb\*
: TODO: do we actually use this?\*exp\*
: null expletive subject
\*con\*
: subject elision under conjunction
(IP-MAT (NP-OB1 (DPDS Dat)) ← first conjunct (VVFIN beleueden) (NP-SBJ (PPER se) (DIN alle)) (PP (APPR myt) (NP (NA willen))) ) (IP-MAT (KON und) (NP-SBJ *con*) ← second conjunct, with elision of subject (VVFIN scheiden) (PP (APPR van) (NP (PPER em))) )
Note:
-
\*con\*
can only be used when the elided subject is coreferential and identical in number with the subject of the precedingIP-MAT
-
If not, then use
\*pro\*
:
(IP-MAT (ADVP-TMP (AVD Do)) (VVFIN brochte) (NP-SBJ (DPIS me)) (PTKVZ wedder) (NP-OB1 (DDARTA de) (ADJA kostlike) (NA kleder)) ) (IP-MAT (KON vnde) (NP-SBJ *pro*) ← *pro* subject (VAFIN wart) (ADVP (AVD vroliken)) (VVPP entfangen) (PP (APPR van) (NP (DIA allen) (NA volke))) )
\*pro\*
: referential null subject
An example:
(IP-MAT (KON vnde) (NP-SBJ *pro*) ← *pro* subject (VAFIN wart) (ADVP (AVD vroliken)) (VVPP entfangen) (PP (APPR van) (NP (DIA allen) (NA volke))) )
Note: \*pro\*
can also be used as a default empty subject where other types of empty subject are not appropriate, e.g. in cases of conjunction reduction where there is number mismatch and thus \*con\*
cannot be used.
\*exp\*
: null expletive subject
A null expletive subject (*exp\*
) is inserted in contexts where an overt expletive could be expected, but is not attested (see also here for more detail on expletive constructions).
(IP-MAT (KON Vnde) (NP-SBJ *exp*) ← null expletive (PP (ADVP (PAVD hijr)) (PAVAP vp)) (VVFIN staet) (PP (APPR in) (NP (DDARTA der) (NA glosen))) (VVPP gheschreuen) )
Other empty categories
There are five other empty non-subject categories:
\*t\*
: traces of wh-movement\*ICH\*
: traces of other types of movement- Empty complementisers (
C 0
) - Empty conjunctions (
KON 0
) - Empty resumptives (
*-RSP 0
)
\*t\*
: traces of wh-movement
Traces of this type are always co-indexed:
(CONJP (KON vnde) (CP-QUE (WNP-1 (DPWS wat)) ← wh-phrase (IP-SUB (NP-PRD *T*-1) ← trace (NP-SBJ (PPER se) (VVFIN is)))) )
\*ICH\*
: traces of other types of movement (e.g. extraposition)
Traces of this type are also always co-indexed:
(IP-SUB (NP-SBJ (PPER se)) (ADJ-PRD (ADJD ledich) (PP *ICH*-1)) ← trace (VVFIN was) (PP-1 (APPR van) ← moved constituent (NP (ADJA guden) (NA daden))) )
Note:
-
The
\*ICH\*
is inserted as early as possible in the source constituent if the movement is upward, and as late as possible in the source constituent if the movement is downward. -
Movements of these kinds are only represented if the movement in question takes the moved constituent out of its source constituent.
Empty complementisers (C 0
)
Empty complementisers (C 0
) are used in a more restricted way than in the general Penn scheme – see elsewhere.
Empty conjunctions (KON 0
)
Departing from the standard Penn policy on null elements, we insert a null conjunction (KON 0
) in contexts where it is motivated, e.g.
- in lists, where the last two elements are overtly conjoined:
(NP-PRN (NE (NE Abram) (KON 0) ← null conjunction (NE Machor) (KON vnde) (NE Aram)) )
Empty resumptives (*-RSP 0
)
This is another departure from the standard Penn policy on null elements (see here on their use).